Ready to Protect Your Brand
Prop 65 Defense
35+ Years In Practice
Food Industry
Litigation
California · Nationwide
Class Action Defense
Prop 65 Defense
35+ Years In Practice
Food Industry
Litigation
California · Nationwide
Class Action Defense
Your production line runs on promises other companies made to you in writing. When a co-packer falls behind on spec, a supplier swaps in an ingredient without telling you, or a distributor just stops doing what the contract says, that promise is what breaks, and your shelf space is what’s actually on the line.
Without in-house counsel, supply chain disputes often fall to you. With over 35 years of exclusive focus on the food, beverage, and supplement industries, The Food Lawyers® understand the mechanics of co-packing and distribution agreements. We identify your leverage quickly to determine the most efficient path forward.
Contact us to schedule a Zoom consultation and get a clear read on where you stand.
The Food Lawyers® handle the disputes that arise inside a food and beverage supply chain, not generic commercial litigation. That includes:
We can bring these disputes or defend against them, depending on which side of the contract you are on.
A contract dispute in the food industry rarely stays a paperwork problem for long. A stalled co-packer relationship can empty a shelf slot a competitor is happy to fill. A recall-cost dispute with a supplier can freeze the cash you need for the next production run.
Under California’s version of the Uniform Commercial Code (Cal. Com. Code § 2601), a buyer’s right to reject nonconforming goods, and a seller’s exposure for shipping them, often comes down to specifications and quality records most companies never expected to need in a legal dispute.
That is where the science matters as much as the contract language. Our in-house food scientists read formulation data, QA records, and spec sheets the same way our attorneys read the agreement itself, so the numbers behind the dispute hold up as well as the argument.
Our contract litigation lawyers start by reading the agreement the way a business reader does, not the way a law school casebook does. We look at what it actually says about performance, cure periods, and remedies, and we figure out where the real leverage sits before we decide on next steps.
Most disputes never need a lawsuit to resolve. If a demand letter, a renegotiated schedule, or a firm deadline gets your supply chain moving again, that is the path we take. If litigation becomes the only way to protect your product line or recover what a breaching party owes you, we are prepared to file and to try the case.
The Food Lawyers® has worked exclusively with the food, beverage, and supplement industries, and is recognized in Chambers USA’s Food & Beverages Spotlight. We know how a co-packing or distribution agreement is supposed to work, which makes it easier to show a court, or the other side, exactly where it broke down.
When a food company faced a $185,500 dispute with a retailer that was heading toward litigation, we redirected the claim from a lawsuit against the retailer to a direct demand against the retailer’s bank, recovering the full amount within two weeks.
This is the kind of leverage we look for first in any contract dispute: the fastest, least costly path to being paid what you are owed.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
California Rules of Ethics, Rule 7.1[4]
Start with the contract itself. Most co-packing agreements include a cure period, meaning the other side gets a defined window to fix the problem before you can terminate or sue. We review that language first, then decide whether a formal notice, a renegotiated schedule, or litigation gets your production line moving again fastest.
That depends on the indemnification and warranty language in your agreement, and on whose failure caused the recall. Contracts that spell out cost allocation in advance resolve this quickly. Contracts that do not often turn into the dispute itself, which is why we review this language before a recall happens whenever we can.
Usually, but the contract’s termination clause controls how. Most agreements require written notice, a cure period, or both, and terminating without following that process can expose you to a breach claim of your own. We confirm the correct process before you send anything.
It depends on whether the matter resolves through a demand and negotiation or moves into litigation. We start every engagement with a Zoom consultation to assess the contract and the leverage in it, so you know the likely path and cost before committing to it.
Disputes resolved through negotiation or a demand letter often move in weeks. Litigation takes longer and depends on the court and the claims involved. We give you a realistic timeline once we have reviewed the actual agreement and the facts.
A contract problem in your supply chain does not get better by waiting. Contact The Food Lawyers® today to Schedule a Zoom Meeting.
Our California food industry contract dispute lawyers can review your agreement, tell you where the leverage sits, and lay out the fastest path back to a working supply chain, whether that means a demand letter, a renegotiation, or a case filed in court.
Fields marked with an * are required
"*" indicates required fields
Copyright © 2026 Salmas Law - The Food Lawyers®• All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy. Digital Marketing By: ![]()
*Images are obtained under license from Canva and other third-party stock image providers, with attribution included where required.