Class Action Averted

Home  |  Case studies  |  Class Action  |  Class Action Averted

Prop 65 Defense

35+ Years In Practice

Food Industry

Litigation

California · Nationwide

Class Action Defense

Prop 65 Defense

35+ Years In Practice

Food Industry

Litigation

California · Nationwide

Class Action Defense

Class Action Averted

By George C. Salmas

  |  

Sep 02, 2026

 

A Los Angeles, nationally-distributed food company, received a class action demand letter saying its most important product, was labeled “No Sugar Added,” in violation of federal law. The Food Lawyers were retained to defend the case. Federal labeling regulations are voluminous, detailed and complex. Also, one regulation will reference another that completely changes the meaning of the first one. Navigating them is not a task for the inexperienced. The Food Lawyers pointed out to plaintiff’s counsel that it didn’t understand a nuance of 21 C.F.R. § 101.60(c)(3) that made our client’s labeling proper. Plaintiff abandoned its case without the payment of any settlement money.

Defending
Food Companies Protecting Business Futures.

CONTACT US

Fields marked with an * are required

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
*

Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Salmas Law - The Food Lawyers®• All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy. Digital Marketing By: rizeup media logo

*Images are obtained under license from Canva and other third-party stock image providers, with attribution included where required.